Showing posts with label Hispanic Era. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hispanic Era. Show all posts

Jul 9, 2026

José Rizal, Critical Historicism, and the Crisis of Nineteenth-Century Philosophy

 by Alan S. Cajes, PhD

Source: Smithsonian Institution

This paper situates José Rizal within the philosophical crisis of the nineteenth century, arguing that his enduring significance lies not merely in nationalist thought or literary achievement, but in a sustained ethical reworking of modern philosophy under conditions of colonial domination. Against the backdrop of Enlightenment disillusionment, Darwinian deep time, and the fragmentation of reason into competing intellectual currents, Rizal emerges as a critical appropriator rather than a passive recipient of European ideas. The study advances three central claims. First, Rizal transforms historicism into a form of critical historicism, rejecting both historical nihilism and teleological philosophies that subsume suffering into rational progress, and recasting history as a site of moral accountability and dignity. Second, he articulates a normative liberalism under constraint, in which freedom is understood not as an endpoint of history but as an ethical discipline requiring education, self-cultivation, and civic vigilance. Third, Rizal develops a philosophy of mediation—rather than synthesis—through which cultural sapin-sapin (layered identity), moral agency under domination, and critical hope are held in productive tension without recourse to metaphysical guarantees or revolutionary absolutism. By integrating history, education, culture, and moral agency into a coherent ethical posture, Rizal offers an account of nationhood as an unfinished project, sustained by responsibility rather than destiny. The paper concludes that Rizal should be read as a philosopher of unfinished freedom, whose thought remains relevant for contemporary debates on coloniality, dignity, and the ethical conditions of political life.

Keywords: José Rizal; nineteenth-century philosophy; critical historicism; coloniality; liberalism under constraint; moral agency; education and civic formation; sapin-sapin; philosophical mediation; critical hope; national consciousness; ethics of freedom

Click to read

Feb 12, 2011

Articles in the Website of the National Historical Commission of the Philippines

Katipunan: Documents and studies

This site is devoted to the study of the Katipunan, the patriotic secret society that in 1896 launched the revolution against Spanish rule in the Philippines. 

 Although the late 19th century is the most celebrated and studied period in Philippine history, much of what has been published on the Katipunan is unreliable and the surviving primary sources are as yet largely unexplored.  The principal aim here is to bring to light a number of important Katipunan documents that have not been published before, or are not readily accessible.   Links will be provided to materials on theKatipunan that may be found elsewhere on the web - most notably on the excellent "Bonifacio Papers" site, which this site will seek to complement, and not in any way to contest.  

The documents are arranged under eight sub-headings – Foundational documents; Supreme Council (Kataastaasang Sangunian); Supreme Assembly (Kataastaasang Kapisanan); Councils and branches (Sangunian at Balangay); Membership documents; Andres Bonifacio; Emilio Jacinto; and Miscellaneous – and under each sub-heading they are ordered chronologically.   The site also includes a number of studies and research notes on the Katipunan, some of which have been posted previously on “BonifacioPapers”.

Comments, corrections, and pointers to other documents that might be posted on the site will be most welcome at kasaysayan@googlemail.com

Jim Richardson

SITE CONTENTS

DOCUMENTS

Foundational documents


Supreme Council (Kataastaasang Sangunian)

Supreme Assembly (Kataastaasang Kapisanan)

Councils and branches (Sangunian at Balangay)

Membership documents

Andres Bonifacio

Emilio Jacinto

Miscellaneous

STUDIES


IMAGES

Copyright © Jim Richardson, 2005-2010.  Jim Richardson asserts his moral right to be known as the author of the studies and notes posted on this website.  Permission is hereby granted to copy and to distribute the pages on the site in their original, unmodified form

Feb 8, 2011

Legaspi’s wish list

By Ambeth Ocampo
Philippine Daily Inquirer
First Posted 23:57:00 01/22/2009

Filed Under: history

This Thursday, Jan. 23, is the anniversary of the Malolos Congress. I should be writing about history connected to Barasoain Church, but my weekend trip to Cebu province on the invitation of the Ramon Aboitiz Foundation Inc. led me to the narrative reports sent by Miguel Lopez de Legaspi from Cebu to the King of Spain in 1565. Most history students have, at some point, read the account of the Magellan expedition by its chronicler Antonio Pigafetta, but they seem to forget Legaspi and Urdaneta.

Contrary to popular belief, the so-called “Spanish period” in Philippine history does not begin with Magellan’s arrival in Cebu and his well-deserved death in the Battle of Mactan in 1521. Magellan may have planted a cross and left the Santo Niño with the wife of Humabon, but that is not a real “conquista” [conquest]. The Spanish dominion over the islands to be known as “Filipinas” began only in 1565, with the arrival of Legaspi. From Cebu, Legaspi moved to other populated and, we presume, important native settlements like Panay and later Maynila (not Maynilad as propagated by the ignorant).

Legaspi is often represented in art going through the Sandugo or Pacto de Sangre (Blood Compact) with Sikatuna. This is the historical basis for Philippine-Spanish friendship and diplomacy. It is also the basis for the Order of Sikatuna conferred by the Republic on diplomats. It is not well known that Magellan entered into a blood compact with Rajah Kolambu in 1521.

Spain is literally in our blood, in our culture. Juan Luna’s iconic “Pacto de Sangre” hangs in Malacañang. Luna used the patrician Trinidad H. Pardo de Tavera as the model for Legaspi and Jose Rizal for Sikatuna. A toast, an exchange of local wine mixed with blood, has also been immortalized by other Filipino artists, including National Artists Vicente Manansala, Carlos V. Francisco and Napoleon Abueva.
In all these representations of history a common error is made as to the source of the blood. Tfor example, the late Blas Ople wrote, “One way of performing ‘sandugo’ is for both parties to offer a cup of wine, the mildest wine available. Each party then incises his/her arm and lets two to three drops of blood from the wound drip into his/her cup. They exchange cups. Each party then raises his/her cup to eye level, shakes the cup to mix the blood with the wine, and drinks from the cup. Preferably, bottoms up, for the eagerness to consume the mixture signifies the depth of each party’s will and determination to honor the agreement until his/her death.”

That is what we imagine the sandugo to be, but the incision is not made on the arm but on the chest! Legaspi’s narration is very clear on this: The blood was drawn from the “pecho.” We are perhaps confused by the drawing of blood for the Katipunan in the 19th century. An incision on the arm drew blood that they used to sign or write out K.K.K oaths.

Why is the mistake on Legaspi perpetuated? Few people today read his reports to the king. I would not have reread Legaspi if not for the controversy over the site of the Blood Compact. This was previously believed to have happened on the side of a road between present-day Tagbilaran and Baclayon in Bohol. As a matter of fact, a historical marker and a life-size tableau of the event marks the spot that has since been proven to be on the wrong side of history, because the site of the Legaspi-Sikatuna blood compact was Loay, Bohol.

Rereading Legaspi I almost skipped a rather detailed list of supplies requested for his camp in Cebu. His wish list was dispatched to Mexico and he arranged the items according to three types: supplies required for barter or gifts; military supplies needed for both defense and offense; supplies required for ships. The barter goods are quite revealing because it shows what he believed the natives needed or desired, as well as what he thought would attract the Chinese and Japanese:

“Two bolts of scarlet Valencia scarlet cloth, with odds and ends, 7 bolts of scarlet Toledo cloth, 6 cases of headdresses, a great quantity of beads, blue green and yellow, 10 breadths of each sort, 2 pcs. crimson velvet, 3 dozen colored hats, one case large gilded coins for the Chinese, 2 bales and 2 boxes linens, 2 quintals of Muzavetas (whatever that means), 4 lbs fine coral of all sorts, 3 quintals glass (one blue), 1,000 bundles glass beads — green and yellow, 500 dozen hawk’s bells, coins and small bars of fine silver for trade in China, 6 caldrons pitch, 2 large caldrons, such as are used for bucking linen; but they must be large and very strong, because they are to be used in making saltpeter, 1,000 sail needles, 2 saddles with long stirrups and colored velvet trimmings, with all rivets, bits, and stirrup-irons to be gilded, 2 cavalry saddles with colored trimmings, all to be of good quality, 6 gilt swords and daggers of good quality which are for the S.S. on the coast of China and for those in the islands of Japan.”

This now historical list may be trivial to most historians, but it makes us recreate the world of 1565 from the value placed on these items. From seemingly insignificant details history can be woven and be made relevant to our times


Feb 6, 2011

The Friarocracy

The power of religious orders remained one of the great constants, over the centuries, of Spanish colonial rule. Even in the late nineteenth century, the friars of the Augustinian, Dominican, and Franciscan orders conducted many of the executive and control functions of government on the local level. They were responsible for education and health measures, kept the census and tax records, reported on the character and behavior of individual villagers, supervised the selection of local police and town officers, and were responsible for maintaining public morals and reporting incidences of sedition to the authorities. Contrary to the principles of the church, they allegedly used information gained in confession to pinpoint troublemakers. Given the minuscule number of Spanish living outside the capital even in the nineteenth century, the friars were regarded as indispensable instruments of Spanish rule that contemporary critics labeled a "friarocracy" (frialocracia).

Controversies over visitation and secularization were persistent themes in Philippine church history. Visitation involved the authority of the bishops of the church hierarchy to inspect and discipline the religious orders, a principle laid down in church law and practiced in most of the Catholic world. The friars were successful in resisting the efforts of the archbishop of Manila to impose visitation; consequently, they operated without formal supervision except that of their own provincials or regional superiors. Secularization meant the replacement of the friars, who came exclusively from Spain, with Filipino priests ordained by the local bishop. This movement, again, was successfully resisted, as friars through the centuries kept up the argument, often couched in crude racial terms, that Filipino priests were too poorly qualified to take on parish duties. Although church policy dictated that parishes of countries converted to Christianity be relinquished by the religious orders to indigenous diocesan priests, in 1870 only 181 out of 792 parishes in the islands had Filipino priests. The national and racial dimensions of secularization meant that the issue became linked with broader demands for political reform.

The economic position of the orders was secured by their extensive landholdings, which generally had been donated to them for the support of their churches, schools, and other establishments. Given the general lack of interest on the part of Spanish colonials--clustered in Manila and dependent on the galleon trade--in developing agriculture, the religious orders had become by the eighteenth century the largest landholders in the islands, with their estates concentrated in the Central Luzon region. Land rents--paid often by Chinese mestizo inquilinos, who planted cash crops for export--provided them with the sort of income that enabled many friars to live like princes in palatial establishments.

Central to the friars' dominant position was their monopoly of education at all levels and thus their control over cultural and intellectual life. In 1863 the Spanish government decreed that a system of free public primary education be established in the islands, which could have been interpreted as a threat to this monopoly. By 1867 there were 593 primary schools enrolling 138,990 students; by 1877 the numbers had grown to 1,608 schools and 177,113 students; and in 1898 there were 2,150 schools and over 200,000 students out of a total population of approximately 6 million. The friars, however, were given the responsibility of supervising the system both on the local and the national levels. The Jesuits were given control of the teacher-training colleges. Except for the Jesuits, the religious orders were strongly opposed to the teaching of modern foreign languages, including Spanish, and scientific and technical subjects to the indios (literally, Indians; the Spanish term for Filipinos). In 1898 the University of Santo Tomás taught essentially the same courses that it did in 1611, when it was founded by the Dominicans, twenty-one years before Galileo was brought before the Inquisition for publishing the idea that the earth revolved around the sun.

The friarocracy seems to have had more than its share of personal irregularities, and the priestly vow of chastity often was honored in the breach. In the eyes of educated Filipino priests and laymen, however, most inexcusable was the friars' open attitude of contempt toward the people. By the late nineteenth century, their attitude was one of blatant racism. In the words of one friar, responding to the challenge of the ilustrados, "the only liberty the Indians want is the liberty of savages. Leave them to their cock-fighting and their indolence, and they will thank you more than if you load them down with old and new rights."

Apolinario de la Cruz, a Tagalog who led the 1839-41 Cofradía de San José revolt, embodied the religious aspirations and disappointments of the Filipinos. A pious individual who sought to enter a religious order, he made repeated applications that were turned down by the racially conscious friars, and he was left with no alternative but to become a humble lay brother performing menial tasks at a charitable institution in Manila. While serving in that capacity, he started the cofradía (confraternity or brotherhood), a society to promote Roman Catholic devotion among Filipinos. From 1839 to 1840, Brother Apolinario sent representatives to his native Tayabas, south of Laguna de Bay, to recruit members, and the movement rapidly spread as cells were established throughout the southern Tagalog area. Originally, it was apparently neither anti-Spanish nor nativist in religious orientation, although native elements were prevalent among its provincial followers. Yet its emphasis on secrecy, the strong bond of loyalty its members felt for Brother Apolinario, and, above all, the fact that it barred Spanish and mestizos from membership aroused the suspicions of the authorities. The cofradía was banned by the authorities in 1840.

In the autumn of 1841 Brother Apolinario left Manila and gathered his followers, then numbering several thousands armed with rifles and bolos (heavy, single-bladed knives), at bases in the villages around the town of Tayabas; as a spiritual leader, he preached that God would deliver the Tagalog people from slavery. Although the rebel force, aided by Negrito hill tribesmen, was able to defeat a detachment led by the provincial governor in late October, a much larger Spanish force composed of soldiers from Pampanga Province--the elite of the Philippine military establishment and traditional enemies of the Tagalogs--took the cofradía camp at Alitao after a great slaughter on November 1, 1841.

The insurrection effectively ended with the betrayal and capture of Brother Apolinario. He was executed on November 5, 1841. Survivors of the movement became remontados(those who go back into the mountains), leaving their villages to live on the slopes of the volcanic Mount San Cristobal and Mount Banahao, within sight of Alitao. These mountains, where no friar ventured, became folk religious centers, places of pilgrimage for lowland peasants, and the birthplace of religious communities known as colorums.

THE EARLY SPANISH PERIOD

The first recorded sighting of the Philippines by Europeans was on March 16, 1521, during Ferdinand Magellan's circumnavigation of the globe. Magellan landed on Cebu, claimed the land for Charles I of Spain, and was killed one month later by a local chief. The Spanish crown sent several expeditions to the archipelago during the next decades. Permanent Spanish settlement was finally established in 1565 when Miguel López de Legazpi, the first royal governor, arrived in Cebu from New Spain (Mexico). Six years later, after defeating a local Muslim ruler, he established his capital at Manila, a location that offered the excellent harbor of Manila Bay, a large population, and proximity to the ample food supplies of the central Luzon rice lands. Manila remained the center of Spanish civil, military, religious, and commercial activity in the islands. The islands were given their present name in honor of Philip II of Spain, who reigned from 1556 to 1598.

Spain had three objectives in its policy toward the Philippines, its only colony in Asia: to acquire a share in the spice trade, to develop contacts with China and Japan in order to further Christian missionary efforts there, and to convert the Filipinos to Christianity. Only the third objective was eventually realized, and this not completely because of the active resistance of both the Muslims in the south and the Igorot, the upland tribal peoples in the north. Philip II explicitly ordered that pacification of the Philippines be bloodless, to avoid a repetition of Spain's sanguinary conquests in the Americas. Occupation of the islands was accomplished with relatively little bloodshed, partly because most of the population (except the Muslims) offered little armed resistance initially.

Church and state were inseparably linked in carrying out Spanish policy. The state assumed administrative responsibility--funding expenditures and selecting personnel--for the new ecclesiastical establishments. Responsibility for conversion of the indigenous population to Christianity was assigned to several religious orders: the Dominicans, Franciscans, and Augustinians, known collectively as the friars-- and to the Jesuits. At the lower levels of colonial administration, the Spanish built on traditional village organization by co-opting the traditional local leaders, thereby ruling indirectly.

This system of indirect rule helped create in rural areas a Filipino upper class, referred to as the principalía or the principales (principal ones). This group had local wealth; high status and prestige; and certain privileges, such as exemption from taxes, lesser roles in the parish church, and appointment to local offices. The principalía was larger and more influential than the preconquest nobility, and it created and perpetuated an oligarchic system of local control. Among the most significant and enduring changes that occurred under Spanish rule was that the Filipino idea of communal use and ownership of land was replaced with the concept of private, individual ownership and the conferring of titles on members of the principalía.

Religion played a significant role in Spain's relations with and attitudes toward the indigenous population. The Spaniards considered conversion through baptism to be a symbol of allegiance to their authority. Although they were interested in gaining a profit from the colony, the Spanish also recognized a responsibility to protect the property and personal rights of these new Christians.

The church's work of converting Filipinos was facilitated by the absence of other organized religions, except for Islam, which predominated in the south. The missionaries had their greatest success among women and children, although the pageantry of the church had a wide appeal, reinforced by the incorporation of Filipino social customs into religious observances, for example, in the fiestas celebrating the patron saint of a local community. The eventual outcome was a new cultural community of the main Malay lowland population, from which the Muslims (known by the Spanish as Moros, or Moors) and the upland tribal peoples of Luzon remained detached and alienated.

The Spanish found neither spices nor exploitable precious metals in the Philippines. The ecology of the islands was little changed by Spanish importations and technical innovations, with the exception of corn cultivation and some extension of irrigation in order to increase rice supplies for the growing urban population. The colony was not profitable, and a long war with the Dutch in the seventeenth century and intermittent conflict with the Moros nearly bankrupted the colonial treasury. Annual deficits were made up by a subsidy from Mexico.

Colonial income derived mainly from entrepôt trade: The "Manila galleons" sailing from Acapulco on the west coast of Mexico brought shipments of silver bullion and minted coin that were exchanged for return cargoes of Chinese goods, mainly silk textiles. There was no direct trade with Spain. Failure to exploit indigenous natural resources and investment of virtually all official, private, and church capital in the galleon trade were mutually reinforcing tendencies. Loss or capture of the galleons or Chinese junks en route to Manila represented a financial disaster for the colony.

The thriving entrepôt trade quickly attracted growing numbers of Chinese to Manila. The Chinese, in addition to managing trade transactions, were the source of some necessary provisions and services for the capital. The Spanish regarded them with mixed distrust and acknowledgment of their indispensable role. During the first decades of Spanish rule, the Chinese in Manila became more numerous than the Spanish, who tried to control them with residence restrictions, periodic deportations, and actual or threatened violence that sometimes degenerated into riots and massacres of Chinese during the period between 1603 and 1762.

The Spanish period

Spanish colonial motives were not, however, strictly commercial. The Spanish at first viewed the Philippines as a stepping-stone to the riches of the East Indies (Spice Islands), but, even after the Portuguese and Dutch had foreclosed that possibility, the Spanish still maintained their presence in the archipelago.

The Portuguese navigator and explorer Ferdinand Magellan headed the first Spanish foray to the Philippines when he made landfall on Cebu in March 1521; a short time later he met an untimely death on the nearby island of Mactan. After King Philip II (for whom the islands are named) had dispatched three further expeditions that ended in disaster, he sent out Miguel López de Legazpi, who established the first permanent Spanish settlement, in Cebu, in 1565. The Spanish city of Manila was founded in 1571, and by the end of the 16th century most of the coastal and lowland areas from Luzon to northernMindanao were under Spanish control. Friars marched with soldiers and soon accomplished the nominal conversion to Roman Catholicism of all the local people under Spanish administration. But the Muslims of Mindanao and Sulu, whom the Spanish called Moros, were never completely subdued by Spain.

Spanish rule for the first 100 years was exercised in most areas through a type of tax farming imported from the Americas and known as the encomienda. But abusive treatment of the local tribute payers and neglect of religious instruction by encomenderos (collectors of the tribute), as well as frequent withholding of revenues from the crown, caused the Spanish to abandon the system by the end of the 17th century. The governor-general, himself appointed by the king, began to appoint his own civil and military governors to rule directly.

Central government in Manila retained a medieval cast until the 19th century, and the governor-general was so powerful that he was often likened to an independent monarch. He dominated the Audiencia, or high court, was captain-general of the armed forces, and enjoyed the privilege of engaging in commerce for private profit.

Manila dominated the islands not only as the political capital. The galleon trade with Acapulco, Mex., assured Manila’s commercial primacy as well. The exchange of Chinese silks for Mexican silver not only kept in Manila those Spanish who were seeking quick profit, but it also attracted a large Chinese community. The Chinese, despite being the victims of periodic massacres at the hands of suspicious Spanish, persisted and soon established a dominance of commerce that survived through the centuries.

Manila was also the ecclesiastical capital of the Philippines. The governor-general was civil head of the church in the islands, but the archbishop vied with him for political supremacy. In the late 17th and 18th centuries the archbishop, who also had the legal status of lieutenant governor, frequently won. Augmenting their political power, religious orders, Roman Catholic hospitals and schools, and bishops acquired great wealth, mostly in land. Royal grants and devises formed the core of their holdings, but many arbitrary extensions were made beyond the boundaries of the original grants.

The power of the church derived not simply from wealth and official status. The priests and friars had a command of local languages rare among the lay Spanish, and in the provinces they outnumbered civil officials. Thus, they were an invaluable source of information to the colonial government. The cultural goal of the Spanish clergy was nothing less than the full Christianization and Hispanization of the Filipino. In the first decades of missionary work, local religions were vigorously suppressed; old practices were not tolerated. But as the Christian laity grew in number and the zeal of the clergy waned, it became increasingly difficult to prevent the preservation of ancient beliefs and customs under Roman Catholic garb. Thus, even in the area of religion, pre-Spanish Filipino culture was not entirely destroyed.

Economic and political institutions were also altered under Spanish impact but perhaps less thoroughly than in the religious realm. The priests tried to move all the people into pueblos, or villages, surrounding the great stone churches. But the dispersed demographic patterns of the old barangays largely persisted. Nevertheless, the datu’s once hereditary position became subject to Spanish appointment.

Agricultural technology changed very slowly until the late 18th century, as shifting cultivation gradually gave way to more intensive sedentary farming, partly under the guidance of the friars. The socioeconomic consequences of the Spanish policies that accompanied this shift reinforced class differences. The datus and other representatives of the old noble class took advantage of the introduction of the Western concept of absolute ownership of land to claim as their own fields cultivated by their various retainers, even though traditional land rights had been limited to usufruct. These heirs of pre-Spanish nobility were known as the principalia and played an important role in the friar-dominated local government.